And some of us are onto other things. ~PM-------------- > Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 00:11:41 -0500 > Subject: [agi] Conceptual Structure? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > No one in these groups has been interested in discussing conceptual > structure with me. I think that is a bit odd. I suppose I should draw > some conclusions from that, accept it and move on. > > Structure is more than correlation. You might 'discover' structure > using correlation but only if your program was able to create theories > about structure and apply them via some mechanism other than > correlation. One possibility is that structure is conceptually > abstract so a handful of relations would be adequate to handle the > representation of an immense variety of structural relations. But if > that is true, then that should make conceptual structure easy to apply > and to study. And that should mean that conceptual structure is > something that should generate a lot of discussion in AI / AGI groups > like this. > > The only conclusion I can come to is that most of the people in this > group are not actually working on viable projects, so they are more > preoccupied by more familiar mainstream discussions and discussions > about outlier conjectures that could have a major impact on the > feasibility of AGI if they were themselves feasible. > Jim Bromer > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
