On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 09:48:03AM +1000, colin hales wrote: > Sorry about the previous empty. Phone issue. 10 thumbs. > > My particular flavour of the non-computer approach is irrelevant. I am not > pushing my own at all. > > Robot $ and kind irrelevant. I have the math you speak of. Wrong on both > counts. > > I do not care what kind of NC-AGI arises. All I know is that NC-AGI > important, neglected and needs a champion.
okay so obviously you are the champion. Why is it important? you guys have been talking about it for a week now, and I still have no idea why you think it has value. like lets be honest here, anything that isn't a computer or technology is biology. so what you are really talking about (seems to me) is biological-AGI, or connecting a vat of brain-cells to a computer. this has been done, and can play simple video games. but so can deep neuronets on computers. > So please set anything you think you know about me or my approach aside. You > actually know almost nothing and what little that is is irrelevant to what is > happening in this thread. okay so do you have some kind of proprietary secret approach? I was thinking you can Dorian can sign an NDA and then no one will ever know about anything you guys do. personally I think that there are a lot of potential ethical issues with using biological mediums for computation, also they aren't particularly scalable or portable. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
