On 10/27/15, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > This seems to allow pushing the indeterminacy though your mathematical > structure while keeping the structure intact enough in relation to the > “wetness” of indeterminacy. I don’t know though if this “wetness” is > accurate enough in the propagation or just symbolically superficial... > increasing levels of indeterminacy should produce structural degradation but > Neutrosophy allows you to carry it along somehow. But there is much overlap > with the other mathematical technologies. I like this one though for some > reason… maybe because it has cult appeal :) > > > > John
What do you mean "cult appeal"? (a joke?) I read about 70 pages.... It looks like they apply their fuzzy-ish TRUE/Indeterminate/False property to literally everything in their system. I mean EVERYTHING. Something has a certain degree of stability, something has degrees of membership, a degree of quality, whatever. It's always or nearly always the same form. I wonder how well this holds up in scale....The overall design is one of chaos/dynamics. This reminds me a bit of Ben's work on probability/logic. Mike A > > > > From: Aaron Hosford [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2015 5:14 PM > To: AGI <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [agi] Everything is not (t, i, f) = (1, 0, 0) > > > > Interesting, but it's a lot to wade into without knowing whether it's worth > my (unfortunately very limited) time. How is this different from other > multi-valued logics? What does it do that probability theory doesn't cover? > > On Oct 24, 2015 3:40 AM, "John Rose" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > For those into logic based AI/AGI, man, Smarandache is really going full > bore on propagating neutrosophy throughout mathematics. For example - going > into how neutrosophic dynamic system behavior verses non-neutrosophic > behavior changes chaotically, to modifying propositional logic for > neutrosophy, to defining netrosophic octonionics. to almost - not quite > getting to a neutrosophic entropy in this book: > http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/SymbolicNeutrosophicTheory.pdf > > but with some Googling you can find other people that have begun to bang > out > a definition of neutrosophic entropy. IMO very powerful stuff. So I'm going > to try to understand how a neutrosophic entropy compares to traditional > fuzzy entropies and perhaps how that would affect say the Wissner-Gross > Causal Entropic Force. Out of curiosity... > > John > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-2da819ff > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/? > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> & > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > > > AGI | <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> Archives > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/248029-82d9122f> | > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Modify Your Subscription > > <http://www.listbox.com> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
