> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Archbold [mailto:[email protected]] > > By the way, that is the way Hegel had his judgment -- with those 3 values. > The > authors seem to claim that old dialectics did not venture into the fuzzy > middle of > true/false, but in fact Hegel's work has many such references. Hegel had the > category of "absolute indifference" in which something was not either/or but a > fuzzy combination. >
For an idea, theory, or concept <A> there are <nonA>, <antiA> and <neutA> (neutralities of A). Hegel asserted <A> tends to be neutralized to <neutA> by <antiA>. Neutrosophy looks towards <nonA> as neutralizer. I think that is part of the difference. Hegelians are Thesis, Antithesis then Synthesis. Neutrosophians(?) are Thesis, Antithesis, Neutrothesis then Neutrosynthesis. John ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
