One of my big motivations to get into AGI is that I have long NOT
considered a human being some kind of gold standard of intelligence.
Racism is just one piece of the problem.  The solution, though, still
a long way off...

On 2/22/17, Dr Miles Dyson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems as though the answer Microsoft came up with for preventing its
> chat bot "Zo" from ending up racist like "Tay", is through the development
> of a content moderator (
> https://www.microsoft.com/cognitive-services/en-us/content-moderator ).
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Mark Nuzz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jan Matusiewicz <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> AGI should show us the truth. It shouldn't be deliberately biased. And
>>> this is the best weapon against racism. Racism is irrational - it comes
>>> from, built in human nature, bias against aliens. Humans have a tendency
>>> to
>>> generalize negative features of units to whole groups in a very
>>> different
>>> way for our group and the alien group. We have examples of that in the
>>> history and now. The idea that some nations should be eradicated or
>>> enslaved because they so much differ from our nation is riddiculous. But
>>> is
>>> was very popular. Assuming that all people from particular countries
>>> should
>>> be banned from entering your country is also irrational but appealing
>>> for
>>> many.
>>>
>> Slavery and genocide is of course a bad thing! We can objectively define
>> those things. But can you objectively define racism? Where do you draw
>> the
>> line? Is acknowledging that there are genetic differences between races,
>> which goes beyond cosmetics, itself a form of racism? Is drawing
>> correlations between race and anything else a form of racism? What if an
>> AGI were to disagree with you on that (whatever your opinion is)? What if
>> an AGI were to disagree with another AGI on that? It's a pretty bold
>> claim
>> to say that this is a clear cut case of objectivity. If that were so,
>> there
>> wouldn't be any room for debate, but there clearly is if you're one of
>> the
>> few who hasn't turned your social network into an echo chamber by now.
>>
>> Taking this one step further, with your own example, what if AGI were to
>> determine that slavery of 5% of the population was the only viable way
>> for
>> human prosperity? The "threat" is not that we won't be able to shut it
>> off,
>> but that we won't want to. I'm not sure that AGI can even save humanity
>> from itself anymore.
>>
>>
>>
>>> An AGI which tries to be as objective as possible would be free from
>>> this
>>> dangerous tendency. This would make political correctness unnecessary
>>> for
>>> it. However it is possible that people would interpret its finding in a
>>> racist way. For example it may find out that ethnic group A is better at
>>> IQ
>>> tests then group B, but this is be due to lower educational level of B.
>>> Some people would repeat only the first part of its finding.
>>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:51 Dr Miles Dyson,
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If the world is such that the data that exists supports empirical and
>>>> scientific racism (or insert your politically incorrect world view
>>>> here),
>>>> how could we create a AGI that could avoid (or minimize the likelihood
>>>> of
>>>> it) taking such an undesirable view?
>>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/28565694-f30243b8> |
>>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>>
>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/2552162-5fb4be76> |
>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>>
>>
>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> |
>> Modify
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
>> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to