I suppose one way to reduce the likelihood of creating bad AGI's is to
ensure its first interactions in the world are not with 4chan.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:

> One of my big motivations to get into AGI is that I have long NOT
> considered a human being some kind of gold standard of intelligence.
> Racism is just one piece of the problem.  The solution, though, still
> a long way off...
>
> On 2/22/17, Dr Miles Dyson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It seems as though the answer Microsoft came up with for preventing its
> > chat bot "Zo" from ending up racist like "Tay", is through the
> development
> > of a content moderator (
> > https://www.microsoft.com/cognitive-services/en-us/content-moderator ).
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Mark Nuzz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Jan Matusiewicz <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> AGI should show us the truth. It shouldn't be deliberately biased. And
> >>> this is the best weapon against racism. Racism is irrational - it comes
> >>> from, built in human nature, bias against aliens. Humans have a
> tendency
> >>> to
> >>> generalize negative features of units to whole groups in a very
> >>> different
> >>> way for our group and the alien group. We have examples of that in the
> >>> history and now. The idea that some nations should be eradicated or
> >>> enslaved because they so much differ from our nation is riddiculous.
> But
> >>> is
> >>> was very popular. Assuming that all people from particular countries
> >>> should
> >>> be banned from entering your country is also irrational but appealing
> >>> for
> >>> many.
> >>>
> >> Slavery and genocide is of course a bad thing! We can objectively define
> >> those things. But can you objectively define racism? Where do you draw
> >> the
> >> line? Is acknowledging that there are genetic differences between races,
> >> which goes beyond cosmetics, itself a form of racism? Is drawing
> >> correlations between race and anything else a form of racism? What if an
> >> AGI were to disagree with you on that (whatever your opinion is)? What
> if
> >> an AGI were to disagree with another AGI on that? It's a pretty bold
> >> claim
> >> to say that this is a clear cut case of objectivity. If that were so,
> >> there
> >> wouldn't be any room for debate, but there clearly is if you're one of
> >> the
> >> few who hasn't turned your social network into an echo chamber by now.
> >>
> >> Taking this one step further, with your own example, what if AGI were to
> >> determine that slavery of 5% of the population was the only viable way
> >> for
> >> human prosperity? The "threat" is not that we won't be able to shut it
> >> off,
> >> but that we won't want to. I'm not sure that AGI can even save humanity
> >> from itself anymore.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> An AGI which tries to be as objective as possible would be free from
> >>> this
> >>> dangerous tendency. This would make political correctness unnecessary
> >>> for
> >>> it. However it is possible that people would interpret its finding in a
> >>> racist way. For example it may find out that ethnic group A is better
> at
> >>> IQ
> >>> tests then group B, but this is be due to lower educational level of B.
> >>> Some people would repeat only the first part of its finding.
> >>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 21:51 Dr Miles Dyson,
> >>> <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> If the world is such that the data that exists supports empirical and
> >>>> scientific racism (or insert your politically incorrect world view
> >>>> here),
> >>>> how could we create a AGI that could avoid (or minimize the likelihood
> >>>> of
> >>>> it) taking such an undesirable view?
> >>>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> >>>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/28565694-f30243b8> |
> >>>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
> >>>> <http://www.listbox.com>
> >>>>
> >>> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> >>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/2552162-5fb4be76> |
> >>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
> >>> <http://www.listbox.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee> |
> >> Modify
> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> >> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > AGI
> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> 11943661-d9279dae
> > Modify Your Subscription:
> > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> AGI
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/
> member/?&
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to