| Neural Correlates of Consciousness |
| Thomas Metzinger |
|
This book brings together an international group of neuroscientists and philosophers who are investigating how the content of subjective experience is correlated with events in the brain. The fundamental methodological problem in consciousness research is the subjectivity of the target phenomenon--the fact that conscious experience, under standard conditions, is always tied to an individual, first-person perspective. The core empirical question is whether and how physical states of the human nervous system can be mapped onto the content of conscious experience. The search for the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) has become a highly active field of investigation in recent years. Methods such as single-cell recording in monkeys and brain imaging and electrophysiology in humans, applied to such phenomena as blindsight, implicit/explicit cognition, and binocular rivalry, have generated a wealth of data. The same period has seen the development of a number of theories about NCC location. This volume brings together the leading experimentalists and theoreticians in the field. Topics include foundational and evolutionary issues, global integration, vision, consciousness and the NMDA receptor complex, neuroimaging, implicit processes, intentionality and phenomenal volition, schizophrenia, social cognition, and the phenomenal self. |
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Philip Sutton
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 11:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [agi] What are qualia...Hi Ben,I just read Chalmers article and yours.You concluded your article with:> In artificial intelligence terms, the present theory suggests that if> an AI program is constructed so that its dynamics give rise to a> constant stream of patterns that are novel and significant (measured> relative to the system itself), then this program will report> experiences of awareness and consciousness somewhat similar to those> that humans report.This is a useful statement because it testable at some stage when AI exists that can hold complex conversations.By the way, would it be true that a "novel and significant" pattern is one that by definition trigger the AI's attention system? If so then that is a commmon point in both our speculations.I think I've nearly exhausted the value of my speculations for the moment. My intuition is that qualia are going to be different in intelligences that do *not* have long evolutionary histories of being social, compared to those that do have such histories (a species could be currently non-social, but if it has evolved from antecendents that have gone through a social phase then my guess is that it would experieice qualia more like social species ie. the capacity for experiencing qualia is like to be retained to some degree).My guess is that there will be structured processes discovered in brains that account for the subjective experience of qualia - and that qualia will not be experienced without some appropriate system for qualia generation ie. pattern recognition by an AI will not be enough by itself to give rise to the experience of qualia. But this intuition is so speculative and so poorly based on my part that it probably doesn't warrant comment from others! :) So I might leave it there and just wait to see what people come up with in the future.Cheers, Philip
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
