On 5/17/07, J Storrs Hall, PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 04:47:53 pm Mike Tintner wrote:
> Josh
> ". If you'd read the archives,
> > you'd see that I've advocated constructive solid geometry in Hilbert
> > spaces
> > as the basic representational primitive.
>
> Would you like to say more re your representational primitives? Sounds
> interesting. The archives have no reference to "constructive solid geometry
> in Hilbert spaces" in any form. Personally, I think it's a plot.
MOOO ha ha ha! It's all in your mind :-)
Actually, I can't find it either but (and this is apropos to the subject) we
rarely remember the exact words we said or heard; we remember more abstract
representations. Chances I used "CSG" and/or "vector spaces". Hilbert space
is a rhetorical flourish anyway -- they may need it to describe quantum
mechanics precisely but we'll never implement it...
Many engineering departments make the mistake of never mentioning the
term "Hilbert space" and calling it all signal analysis.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
