agi  

Messages by Thread

• • [agi] The Collective Brain Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Jan Klauck
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Jan Klauck
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Jan Klauck
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Collective Brain Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • [agi] Pretty worldchanging Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Pretty worldchanging Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Pretty worldchanging Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Pretty worldchanging Panu Horsmalahti
  • Re: [agi] Pretty worldchanging Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Pretty worldchanging Boris Kazachenko
  • RE: [agi] Pretty worldchanging John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Comments On My Skepticism of Solomonoff Induction Jim Bromer
• [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? David Jones
  • Re: [agi] How do we Score Hypotheses? Jim Bromer
• [agi] Mechanical Analogy for Neural Operation! Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Mechanical Analogy for Neural Operation! Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Mechanical Analogy for Neural Operation! Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Mechanical Analogy for Neural Operation! Michael Swan
  • [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Robert Picone
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially define everything and how do you combine them ? Robert Picone
• [agi] My Sing. U lecture on AGI blogged at Wired UK: Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] My Sing. U lecture on AGI blogged at Wired UK: The Wizard
  • Re: [agi] My Sing. U lecture on AGI blogged at Wired UK: Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] My Sing. U lecture on AGI blogged at Wired UK: The Wizard
• [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] Solomonoff Induction is Not "Universal" and Probability is not "Prediction" John G. Rose
  • [agi] Cash in on robots Mike Tintner
• [agi] New KurzweilAI.net site... with my silly article & sillier chatbot ;-p ;) .... Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] New KurzweilAI.net site... with my silly article & sillier chatbot ;-p ;) .... Mike Archbold
  • Re: [agi] New KurzweilAI.net site... with my silly article & sillier chatbot ;-p ;) .... The Wizard
  • RE: [agi] New KurzweilAI.net site... with my silly article & sillier chatbot ;-p ;) .... John G. Rose
• [agi] The true AGI Distinction David Jones
• [agi] Theory of Hardcoded Intelligence M E
  • Re: [agi] Theory of Hardcoded Intelligence Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Theory of Hardcoded Intelligence Ian Parker
• [agi] Reward function vs utility Joshua Fox
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Joshua Fox
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Joshua Fox
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Ian Parker
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Joshua Fox
  • Re: [agi] Reward function vs utility Abram Demski
• [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? rob levy
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? rob levy
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? rob levy
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Ian Parker
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Gabriel Recchia
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Ian Parker
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Hutter - A fundamental misdirection? Steve Richfield
• [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Michael Swan
  • Re: [agi] Huge Progress on the Core of AGI Mike Tintner
  • [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] A Primary Distinction for an AGI David Jones

• Earlier messages
• Later messages