On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Mark Waser wrote:
There is nothing necessary to hold up in court. The trustees/"trustworthy owners" are taking the action. The fact that their decision was based upon the ramblings of an AGI is entirely irrelevant as far as the legal system is concerned. There is, of course, the danger of trustee defection but I don't believe that you can legally stop that short of declaring the AGI a person and making the trustees unnecessary (and I'm not holding my breath). The entire point of the trustees is to provide the correct legal cover for the AGI.
That sounds like a contributor lawsuit waiting to happen outside of the contributors contractually agreeing to have zero rights, and who would want to sign such a contract?
Cheers, J. Andrew Rogers ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
