> From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Top three? I don't know if anyone ranks them. > > Try: > > 1) Grounding Problem (the *real* one, not the cheap substitute that > everyone usually thinks of as the symbol grounding problem). > > 2) The problem of desiging an inference control engine whose behavior is > predictable/governable etc. > > 3) A way to represent things - and in particular, uncertainty - without > getting buried up to the eyeballs in (e.g.) temporal logics that nobody > believes in. > > Take this with a pinch of salt: I am sure there are plenty of others. > But if you came up with a *principled* solution to these issues, I'd be > impressed. >
Thanks Richard for listing these. I have thought about 1 and 3 more than 2. But I am not sure I understand any of them fully enough to comment as I can tell from some of your other emails that many people have made speculations and declarations in guerilla warfare fashion afterwards yet to be found amidst the jungle causing frustration and anxiety to those who have truly dove deep into the conundrums. I think that you have some emails on the Grounding Problem way back. Also I feel that I have some good ideas on #3... including analogies. But inference control engines can be tough. That is more of a #1 I think. John ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=71731204-c8cf46
