agi  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman David Jones
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman David Jones
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman David Jones
  • RE: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Ian Parker
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Mike Tintner
  • RE: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Ian Parker
  • RE: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Ian Parker
  • RE: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Ian Parker
  • Re: [agi] The problem with AGI per Sloman Fatmah
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory rob levy
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory rob levy
  • Re: [agi] An alternative plan to discover self-organization theory David Jones
• [agi] Paper: Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience Mark Waser
• [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention Bob Mottram
  • Re: [agi] Bayesian surprise attracts human attention Richard Loosemore
• [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Mike Tintner
  • [agi] Synaptic depression enables neuronal gain control Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] Doubts raised over brain scan findings Ronald C. Blue
• [agi] just a thought Valentina Poletti
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Christopher Carr
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] just a thought John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] just a thought Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] just a thought John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Bob Mottram
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Valentina Poletti
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Joshua Cowan
  • Re: [agi] just a thought Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] just a thought David Clark
• [agi] The fuzzy creative calculator. Ronald C Blue
  • [agi] Encouraging? Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Encouraging? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Encouraging? Kyle Kidd
  • Re: [agi] Encouraging? Matt Mahoney
• [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] fuzzy-probabilistic logic again Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Bob Mottram
  • RE: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Lukasz Kaiser
  • Re: [agi] initial reaction to A2I2's call center product Matt Mahoney
• [agi] time-sensitive issue: voting members sought to participate in upcoming election for H+ (World Transhumanist Association) Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Looking Into Your Mind Jim Bromer
• Re: [agi] The Smushaby Mike Tintner
• [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Nathan Cook
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Lukasz Stafiniak
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Nathan Cook
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Linas Vepstas
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Benjamin Johnston
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Benjamin Johnston
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] What Must a World Be That a Humanlike Intelligence May Develop In It? Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Harry Chesley
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Harry Chesley
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Harry Chesley
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Ronald C. Blue
  • [agi] Identity in an Ouchi illusion... Ronald C. Blue
  • RE: [agi] Identity & abstraction Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Identity & abstraction Richard Loosemore
• [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway...PS Mike Tintner
  • RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ronald C. Blue
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Richard Loosemore
  • [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] [WAS The Smushaby] The Logic of Creativity Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Matt Mahoney
  • Free Association, Creativity and AGI (was RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway.) Benjamin Johnston
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Fuzzy Logic in a General Artificial Intelligent Opponent Processing machine. Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Jim Bromer
  • RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ronald C Blue
  • RE: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ronald C Blue
  • Re: [agi] The Smushaby of Flatway. Ed Porter
• [agi] 2 D holographic wavelet interference opponent processing Ronald C. Blue
• [agi] Epineuronal programming Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Epineuronal programming Abram Demski
• [agi] Direct communication between minds Lukasz Stafiniak
  • Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds Lukasz Stafiniak
  • Re: [agi] Direct communication between minds Lukasz Stafiniak
• [agi] [GoogleTech Talk] Case-based reasoning for game AI Lukasz Stafiniak
  • Re: [agi] [GoogleTech Talk] Case-based reasoning for game AI Daniel Allen
• [agi] news bit: Evolution of Intelligence More Complex Than Once Thought David Hart
• [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Lukasz Stafiniak
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Jim Bromer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages