> I think that at first sight this goes to support my position in the original > argument with Ben- namely that there are all kinds of ways to get at or read > minds, and there is now an increasing momentum to do that.
Being able to read the stream of subvocalizations coming out from a person's mind, is a very very very long way from being able to "read" the internal cognitive dynamics of a person's thoughts. And, the technology used for the former does not seem capable of being incrementally extended to do the latter. I agree that mind-reading will happen, and that the pace of growth of mind-reading related technologies is exponential. But still you seem to be a bit overoptimistic about the value of the exponent. (Although, I don't discount the possibility of some wild outlier innovation coming along...) -- Ben G ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=79286730-5a7369
