On Feb 17, 2008 3:34 PM, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Lukasz just pointed out, there are two topics: > 1. Cyc as an AGI project > 2. Cyc as a knowledge base useful for AGI systems.
Well, I'm talking about Cyc (and similar systems) as useful for anything at all (other than experience to tell us what doesn't work and why not). But if it's proposed that such a system might be a useful knowledge base for something, then the something will have to have solved the grounding problem, right? And what I'm saying is, I wouldn't start off building a Cyc-like knowledge base and assume the grounding problem will be solved later. I'd start off with the grounding problem. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
