J Storrs Hall, PhD wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 12:22:30 pm, Richard Loosemore wrote:
Mike Tintner wrote:
As Ben said, it's something like "multisensory integrative
consciousness" - i.e. you track a subject/scene with all senses
simultaneously and integratedly.
Conventional approaches to AI may well have trouble in this area, but
since my approach has been directed at these kinds of issues since the
very beginning, to me it looks relatively straightforward in principle.
The real issues are elsewhere.
True. I'd go farther and point out just where they are: You need to have a
system with recognition / action generation integrated between the sensory
modalities to be a trainable animal. To be intelligent, the system has to be
able to *invent new modalities / representations / concepts itself* and
integrate them into the existing mechanism.
True.
Because of the particular methodology that I use, however, I can say
that the architecture required to do that is no longer an issue. My
focus is (mostly) on getting the low level mechanisms to be stable.
Richard Loosemore
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
