On 18/04/2008, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (4) If the system is really general-purpose, then if it can give an > impressive demo on one problem, it should be able to solve all kinds > of problems to roughly the same level.
Thanks for the fun loop Pei, I think I break out at this level. Here is a brief overview on how I think AI might develop. I slowly build a goal orientable, programmable computer architecture that works by guiding the allocation of resources by good programs outbidding less good programs for them in an unstructured economy. Darpa/NASA/network scientists use it on a few projects and find it allows autonomous upgrading of robots and routers, with minimal overhead for the application. This pretty much just saves engineer time. More buzz on the internet gets academics and Open source researchers building/porting and researching higher level reasoning systems that fit on top and can understand the economic signals being sent around. Also methods for transferring skills between different systems are developed to facilitate research. Explosion in widespread use as it becomes ready to communicate and adapt to humans, forming a self-upgrading external brain. As individual humans teach their own brains specific skills, which are then quickly spread between machines (if the owner is altruistic in that fashion and has encouraged and initially installed that program). Then ??? Will Pearson ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
