Vlad:  I agree that some kind of simulation is necessary, probably something
equivalent on high level to a 3D vector sketch of the events
developing in time, containing actors, where necessary structural
schemes of their bodies interacting with structure of the scene, etc.

The recurrent, but underlying question in many related discussions here is whether you, (& Bob & a & linas), think a visual scene - let's say some people dancing, (real life or in a picture) - can be understood *geometrically/mathematically,* (by the use of geometric figures and maths alone). I say it can't, but my impression is that you guys say it can, and I'd like to be sure of your position. [I am moving on here a little from the subject of understanding verbal texts, although it's related].



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to