John LaMuth wrote:
>>  
>> Yes, this is extensively based on Aristotle's "Golden Mean"
>> The input-output flowchart is shown appended below...
>> The details are described at
>> http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/specs.html
>> (the last half)
>>  
>> This is the real deal .... the ultimate TOE of friendly AI communication

############################################
> 
> So it is a theory of everything, now?  Yesterday it was just a patent.
> 
> In fact, it is content-free nonsense.
> 
> I could give you a box-and-arrow diagram describing the entire universe 
> at the same superficial level of detail ... would that mean I was God?
> 
> And would the USPTO then grant me a patent for "System and Method for 
> Managing All of Creation"?
> 
> You do not show the slightest sign of understanding how to build an AGI 
> that behaves in a "friendly" way, or indeed in any other way.  There is 
> no mechanism in your patent.  All you have done is write some "Articles 
> of Good Behavior" that the AGI is supposed to keep on the back of its 
> bedroom door and commit to memory while it is growing up.
 
> Richard Loosemore
***************************************
John replies

Richard

Yes - I consider the content of my patents as a TOE (restricted to the domain 
of emotionally-charged language)
as diagrammed at:

http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/Masterdiagram.html

Virtually every category of affective language (from Rogets Thesaurus) is 
represented

To the great advantage of all-inclusiveness...

JLM

www.charactervalues.org 


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to