Mike,

Valentina was referring to a remark I made (and shouldn't have -- just on general principles) about her making my *personal* kill-list thanks to the LOL she left regarding Richard Loosemore's original reply to the post that started this thread. I should have taken a "time out" before I opened my big fingers. Had I done so, I would have found out (as I did through subsequent exchanges with Richard) that his comments were based on a misunderstanding. He thought what I was calling the "list of things we don't know" was a list of "all things not known." It wasn't. I was referring to the "list of things we know we don't know." I take full responsibility for creating this misunderstanding through sloppy writing/editing. Anyhow, I took Richard's initial comments the wrong way (probably because I'm as insecure as the next person). Valentina's message got read in that context. The misunderstanding has all been worked out now, so there was really no reason for all the initial "drama."

Valentina: if you're reading this, I apologize for overreacting. I re-read your post after I'd calmed down and realized that you did add a brief comment on Richard's reply. You didn't just "pile on." I look forward to hearing more about your views on building an AGI.

I'm happy to see this thread has generated some interesting side discussions. I'm here to learn and, occasionally, see what people who give a lot of time and thought to this subject think of my whacky ideas.

Cheers,

Brad


Mike Tintner wrote:
Er no, I don't believe in killing people :)
I'm not quite sure what you're what getting at. I was just trying to add another layer of complexity to the brain's immensely multilayered processing. Our processing of new words/word combinations shows that there is a creative aspect to this processing - it isn't just matching. Some of this might be done by standard verbal associations/ semantic networks - e.g. yes IMO "artcop" could be a word for, say, art critic - cops "police", and art can be seen as being policed - I may even have that last expression in memory. But in other cases, the processing may have to be done by imaginative association/drawing - "dirksilt" could just conceivably be a word, if I imagine some dirk/dagger-like tool being used on silt, (doesn't make much sense but conceivable for my brain) - I doubt that such reasoning could be purely verbal. Valentina: This is how I explain it: when we perceive a stimulus, word in this case, it doesn't reach our brain as a single neuron firing or synapse, but as a set of already processed neuronal groups or sets of synapses, that each recall various other memories, concepts and neuronal group. Let me clarify this. In the example you give, the wod artcop might reach us as a set of stimuli: art, cop, mediu-sized word, word that begins with a, and so on. All these connect activate various maps in our memory, and if something substantial is monitored at some point (going with Richard's theory of the monitor, I don't have other references of this actually), we form a response.

This is more obvious in the case of sight - where an image is first
    broken into various compontents that are separately elaborated:
    colours, motion, edges, shapes, etc. - and then further sent to the
    upper parts of the memory where they can be associated to higher
    level concepts.
If any of this is not clear let me know, instead of adding me to
    your kill-lists ;-P
On 7/31/08, *Mike Tintner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


        Vlad:

            I think Hofstadter's exploration of jumbles (
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumble ) covers this ground.
            You don't
            just recognize the word, you work on trying to connect it to
            what you
            know, and if set of letters didn't correspond to any word,
            you give
            up.


        There's still more to word recognition though than this. How do
        we decide what is and isn't, may or may not be a word?  A
        neologism? What may or may not be words from:

        cogrough
        dirksilt
        thangthing
        artcop
        coggourd
        cowstock

        or "fomlepaung" or whatever?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*agi* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to