On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think Ed's email was a bit harsh, but not as harsh as many of Richard's > (which are frequently full of language like "fools", "rubbish" and so forth > ...). > > Some of your emails have been pretty harsh in the past too. > > I would be willing to enforce a stronger code of politeness on this list if > that is what the membership wants. I have been told before, in other > contexts, that I tend to be overly tolerant of rude behavior. > > Anyone else have an opinion on this? >
I don't notice rudeness so much, but content-free posts (and posters who don't learn) are a problem on this list. Low signal-to-noise ratio. I'd say you are too tolerant in avoiding moderation, but moderation is needed for content, not just "politeness". -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
