Ben,
I clearly understood/understand this. My point is: are you guys' notions of
non-human intelligence anything more than sci-fi fantasy as opposed to serious
invention? To be the latter, you must have some half-concrete ideas - however
skimpy - of what such intelligence might entail and be different from ours. For
example, would-be flying machine inventors, had some ideas of what such a
machine might entail - wings or wheels or propellor - and would function (even
if mistaken).And they obviously knew the difference between land and air-based
travel. I'm questioning whether y'all have any remotely serious idea at all of
what a non-human intelligence entails - as distinct from purely negative ideas
about what parts of human intelligence you *don't* want to use/copy, and
ethereal ideas about how an AGI will be "much more" intelligent. AFAICT every
AGI project is actually very, very humanoid.
Brad:
Sigh. Your point of view is heavily biased by the unspoken assumption that
AGI
must be Turing-indistinguishable from humans. That it must be AGHI.
Brad,
Literally: "what on earth are you talking about?" What other than human
intelligence - symbol & sign-using intelligence - is there? (& a few Washoe
chimps - & computer extensions of the brain).
He is talking about making something that does not yet exist, just as
airplanes and computer chips did not exist before they were first made.
-- Ben G
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
agi | Archives | Modify Your Subscription
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
