Ben/MT: Cog sci treats humans as if we are rational, consistent thinkers/ 
computers. 

No, it just doesn't.  This is an egregious oversimplification and mis-analysis 
of the cognitive science community and its research and ideas.  Look at the 
heuristics and biases literature, for one thing... and the literature on 
analogical reasoning ... on the cognitive psychology of emotion ... etc. etc. 
etc

Ben,

I suspect this is a similar misunderstanding to Richard's response to the 
above, long ago - and it's an important subject. Cog sci is obsessed with the 
many irrationalities of human thinking, yes. That doesn't mean it doesn't see 
humans as basically rational, consistent, computer-like thinkers dealing mainly 
with rational problems. The irrationalities are seen as so many bugs that can, 
ideally, be fixed. Classic example of this attitude:

"More puzzling is myopic discounting: the tendency in all of us to prefer a 
large late reward to a small early one, but then to flip our preferences as 
time passes and both rewards draw nearer. A familiar example is deciding before 
dinner to skip dessert (a small early reward) in order to lose weight (a large 
late one), but succumbing to temptation when the waiter takes the dessert 
orders. Myopic discounting is easy to produce in the lab: give people (or 
pigeons, for that matter) two buttons, one delivering a small reward now, the 
other delivering a large reward later, and the subject will flip from choosing 
the large reward to choosing the small reward as the small one becomes 
imminent. The weakness of the will is an unsolved problem in economics and 
psychology alike."
Pinker - How The Mind Works

Cog sci. sees all this as puzzling and can't solve the problem of "the weakness 
of the will", because none of it makes sense within a rational thinker 
paradigm, and "myopic discounting" clearly can't be "fixed".

I am advancing an alternative paradigm in which it all does make sense. We 
aren't rational (or irrational) at all for the most part; rational (eg 
logicomathematical) problems are only half at most of the problems we have to 
deal with. Actually, we are creative thinkers, dealing mainly with creative 
problems, (like what to eat tonight as well as how to write a post or design an 
AGI ), and we are designed to be fundamentally and permanently conflicted, (and 
therefore erratically "strong"/"weak"-willed and "unfixable" like democratic 
systems), in order to deal with those problems. (And AGI too is about creative 
not rational problems).



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to