On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Terren Suydam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > She's not asking about the kind of embodiment, she's asking what's the use of > a non-embodied AGI. Your quotation, dealing as it does with low-level input, > is about embodied AGI. >
I believe "non-embodied" meant to refer to I/O fundamentally different from our own (especially considering a context of previous message in this conversation). What is a non-embodied AGI? AGI that doesn't exist? -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
