> As has been said previously, there have been AI projects in the past
> which tried this credits or shares route which turned out to be very
> unsuccessful.  The problem with issuing credits is that, rightly or
> wrongly, an expectation of short term financial reward is built up in
> the minds of some contributors.  When this expectation is not realised
> things can become unpleasant.

People who brought Lehman Brothers probably feel rather "unpleasant"
now.  But that's not a reason to abolish the stock market.  "Caveat
emptor" means "let the buyer beware".

> There are additional problems with the credits idea.  Under such a
> system I suspect that as time goes on an increasing amount of effort
> will be needlessly expended in arguments over who gets how many
> credits and how such credits are fairly approtioned ("I did more work
> on this than you did", "you didn't count the number of hours I spent
> researching rather than code writing", etc), detracting from the work
> which needs to be done.

What would be a better solution?  Right now, *everybody*'s work goes
unaccounted for.

> There is no incompatibility with the idea of developing software under
> a FOSS licence, and then making money out of systems or services
> peripheral to that.  Since the construction of AGIs is likely to be a
> long term effort the open source methodology seems appropriate, and
> under the current economic circumstances paying programmers to work on
> a project whose culmination may be years ahead in the future will
> appear increasingly unattractive.

It will be incompatible with some licenses;  but then many newer
licenses are friendly to business.

A lot of work remains to be done in the AGI core, as well as the
periphery.  Lots of things to be built.

There is no reason why a task is long term, then it shouldn't be paid
for.  Besides, my optimistic estimate of AGI is 5-10 years.  Not very
long-term at all.

> Incidentally, once a true AGI is created the current software
> development paradigm becomes obsolete anyway.

This doesn't sound very logical.  Food will turn into excretion anyway, so...?

YKY


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to