On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> As I understand the way you guys and AI generally work, you create > well-organized spaces which your programs can systematically search for > options. Let's call them "nets" - which have systematic, well-defined and > orderly-laid-out connections between nodes. That is simply incorrect ... the connections between nodes/terms/concepts/whatever are chaotic and self-organized and disorderly, within OpenCogPrime, NARS, or any of a load of other AGI systems. And then you have some cognitive processes that try to build order out of the chaos and create links imposing some fragmentary order ... which won't last long unless actively maintained [roughly: as some folks build directories of parts of the Web...] There is a large body of study of the connection statistics of large networks, and some (but less) study of the dynamics of connection stats in large networks. -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
