John LaMuth wrote:
Colin
Consc. by nature is subjective ...
Can never prove this in a machine -- or other human beings for that
matter
Yes you can. This is a fallacy. You can prove it in humans and you can
prove it in a machine.
You simply demand it do science. Not simple - but possible. I have
written this up.
Should be published this year? Not sure.
We are underutilizing about 4 Billion + human Cons's on the earth today
What goal -- besides vanity -- is there to simulate this mechanically ??
We need to simulate communication, if anything at all ...
John L
The practical mission for me is not human-level AGI.
I aim merely for A-fauna that is adaptive like biology is adaptive.
I target markets where natural fauna struggles or where normal solutions
are damaging.
The rationale for creating human level AGI will be decided by forces
yet to be determined. Relentless, tireless home help for the aged might
be one case.
cheers
colin
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
