John LaMuth wrote:
Colin

Solipsism has always been formally and logically intractable.

Please stand and deliver on your own falacious claims

We can not even be sure how memory works in the brain.

Your claims are patently "perpetual-motion(esque)"

John L
I did not do a work on solipsism. I use actual neuroscience evidence to reveal inconsistencies in our behaviour as scientists. I could have based it on realism. The result would have been the same. I even mixed the 2 'isms in the paper and explained that very thing! The result is the same. The philosophical 'isms were only used as a plot device for a largely philosophical audience. So they'd get it. I even said that in the paper.

Real practical implication arise. Choices by real working scientists scientists about what they use as evidence and what they can construct with what evidence exists. It's all based on empirical fact, which is all in the paper. Look it up, read it all get the point of the paper then contest the claims made in the paper, which are not about any philosophical 'ism being any sort of truth. The point is the inconsistency - discussed at length in the paper. Jeeze...! If we act 'as-if' X is true here..and then false there, we have a case to answer...and that's exactly what scientists do....and I showed the inconsistency source in the figure with evidence! Mind-Brain identity and XYZ interpretation of QM. The conclusion is that (a) there is inconsistency to answer and that (b) scientists need to do self review. Nothing else. I don;t give a stuff about 'isms, they are not the point.

Everything you need is in the paper. I made a very specific claim about the real behaviour of real working scientists everywhere, all about the epistemic options of real working scientists. It is a work of empirical metascience with the actual evidence _*built into the work*_. I don't have to supply a thing. Think I'm stupid enough not to put the evidence in the paper? If this is all that's going to come of it then let's leave it all right there. In fact, lets just do that anyway. Save us both the trouble! :-)

regards
Colin








-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to