On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Russell Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Needing many different >> features just doesn't look like a natural thing for AI-generated >> programs. > > No, it doesn't, does it? And then you run into this requirement that > wasn't obvious on day one, and you cater for that, and then you run > into another requirement, that has to be dealt with in a different > way, and then you run into another... and you end up realizing you've > wasted a great deal of irreplaceable time for no good reason > whatsoever. > > So I figure I might as well document the mistake, in case it saves > someone having to repeat it. >
Well, my point was that maybe the mistake is use of additional language constructions and not their absence? You yourself should be able to emulate anything in lambda-calculus (you can add interpreter for any extension as a part of a program), and so should your AI, if it's to ever learn open-ended models. -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
