Ah. An excellent distinction . . . . Thank you. Very helpful.
Would it then be accurate to say SCIENCE = LEARNING + TRANSMISSION ?
Or, how about, SCIENCE = GROUP LEARNING ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 6:27 PM
Subject: **SPAM** Re: [agi] If your AGI can't learn to play chess it is no
AGI
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone else want to take up the issue of whether there is a distinction
between competent scientific research and competent learning (whether or
not
both are being done by a machine) and, if so, what that distinction is?
Science is about public knowledge. I can learn from personal
experience, but it's only science if I publish my results in such a
way that other people can repeat them.
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
