On 6/19/22 18:51, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Rule 2621/9 (Power=1.0) >> VP Wins >> >> If a player has at least 20 more Winsomes than each other player, >> e CAN Take Over the Economy by announcement, provided no person >> has won the game by doing so in the past 30 days. > > I agree to the following contract: "Winsome More": > 1. G. is the only party to this contract, and can amend or terminate > it by announcement. > 2. Winsomes are a currency tracked by G. in eir monthly report. > 3. G. CAN create, destroy, or transfer Winsomes by announcement. > > > I create 21 Winsomes in my possession. > > Winsome Report: I have 21, nobody else has any. > > Comment: > > There's a bit of ambiguity in these two paragraphs in Rule 1586: > A rule, contract, or regulation that refers to an entity by name > refers to the entity that had that name when the rule first came > to include that reference, even if the entity's name has since > changed. > > If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it > no longer defines the second entity, then the second entity and > its attributes cease to exist. > > Winsomes are no longer "defined" by the rules but they rules do "refer" to > Winsomes. If Winsomes have ceased to exist as per the second paragraph, > they are no longer entities, and the "reference" bit may or may not apply > to *former* entities. "Even if the entity's name has since changed" is > very different than "even if the entity no longer exists", and if rules > referred to no-longer-existing entities then we'd have to go back a long > way into the rules to find terms that were repealed and brought back... > > -G. >
The above is CFJ 3969. I assign CFJ 3969 to ais523. -- Jason Cobb Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
