On 6/22/22 17:25, nix via agora-business wrote: > On 6/22/22 17:22, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> On 6/20/22 17:41, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >>> On 6/20/22 17:40, Jason Cobb wrote: >>>> On 6/19/22 18:51, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Rule 2621/9 (Power=1.0) >>>>>> VP Wins >>>>>> >>>>>> If a player has at least 20 more Winsomes than each other player, >>>>>> e CAN Take Over the Economy by announcement, provided no person >>>>>> has won the game by doing so in the past 30 days. >>>>> I agree to the following contract: "Winsome More": >>>>> 1. G. is the only party to this contract, and can amend or terminate >>>>> it by announcement. >>>>> 2. Winsomes are a currency tracked by G. in eir monthly report. >>>>> 3. G. CAN create, destroy, or transfer Winsomes by announcement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I create 21 Winsomes in my possession. >>>>> >>>>> Winsome Report: I have 21, nobody else has any. >>>>> >>>>> Comment: >>>>> >>>>> There's a bit of ambiguity in these two paragraphs in Rule 1586: >>>>> A rule, contract, or regulation that refers to an entity by name >>>>> refers to the entity that had that name when the rule first came >>>>> to include that reference, even if the entity's name has since >>>>> changed. >>>>> >>>>> If the entity that defines another entity is amended such that it >>>>> no longer defines the second entity, then the second entity and >>>>> its attributes cease to exist. >>>>> >>>>> Winsomes are no longer "defined" by the rules but they rules do "refer" to >>>>> Winsomes. If Winsomes have ceased to exist as per the second paragraph, >>>>> they are no longer entities, and the "reference" bit may or may not apply >>>>> to *former* entities. "Even if the entity's name has since changed" is >>>>> very different than "even if the entity no longer exists", and if rules >>>>> referred to no-longer-existing entities then we'd have to go back a long >>>>> way into the rules to find terms that were repealed and brought back... >>>>> >>>>> -G. >>>>> >>>> The above is CFJ 3969. >>>> >>>> I assign CFJ 3969 to ais523. >>>> >>> Sorry, subject line was wrong. >>> >>> This message contains no game actions. >>> >> >> Okay apparently I'm an idiot and the message never actually called a >> CFJ, so the assignment failed and ais523 has nothing to judge. >> >> -- >> Jason Cobb >> >> Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason >> > > CFJ: CFJ 3936 does exist, is the entire contents of the message from G. > quoted above, was created by Jason, and was assigned to ais523 successfully. > > Arguments: We let people create CFJs by simply calling text a CFJ pretty > regularly. Jason called it a CFJ and assigned it. Looks like a CFJ to me. > > -- > nix > Herald, Registrar, Collector >
I withdraw the CFJ I created above. I CFJ: CFJ 3969 does exist, is the entire contents of the message from G. quoted above, was created by Jason, and was assigned to ais523 successfully. -- nix Herald, Registrar, Collector
