On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Geoffrey Spear<geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Aaron Goldfein<aarongoldf...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Isn't >> the point of the game to have arbitrary proposals? As it is, the >> number of proposals (including good proposals) will drop. I know I >> won't be submitting as many. > > The point of the game is that the rules can change. Whether it's good > for the game to have many many proposals are a few well thought out > ones is a matter of opinion. It should be noted that nomic was > modeled after the US Constitution, and I'm not aware of many people > who think the Amendment Clause there is fatally flawed because it > doesn't encourage frequent amendments.
I don't think Agora would be much of a game if its rules were only amended 27 times in 230 years.
