Tend to agree. I mean, the stamens is true, but you're judging the case
false? Or am I getting this wrong?


On Saturday, September 17, 2016, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk>

> On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:26 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > The final issue of the case is to assign a valid judgement to the CFJ. My
> > options, per rule 591, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is not
> > appropriate in the circumstances, based on the facts of the case at the
> > time the CFJ was initiated and the text of rule 591, but the rules
> > otherwise provide no guidance as to preferring TRUE over FALSE. Thus, I
> > judge this CFJ FALSE.
> Beautiful. I suppose this relies on an argument that TRUE is not the
> same thing as true?
> --
> ais523

Reply via email to