Tend to agree. I mean, the stamens is true, but you're judging the case false? Or am I getting this wrong?
-Aris On Saturday, September 17, 2016, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:26 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > The final issue of the case is to assign a valid judgement to the CFJ. My > > options, per rule 591, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is not > > appropriate in the circumstances, based on the facts of the case at the > > time the CFJ was initiated and the text of rule 591, but the rules > > otherwise provide no guidance as to preferring TRUE over FALSE. Thus, I > > judge this CFJ FALSE. > > Beautiful. I suppose this relies on an argument that TRUE is not the > same thing as true? > > -- > ais523 >
