On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> nichdel's interpretation, that TRUE
> and/or FALSE are only valid for a true and false statement, respectively,
> lead to the even more absurd result that any attempt to assign an incorrect
> judgement fails platonically (since a judge can only assign valid
> judgements).

Being absurd doesn't generally make it untrue.

If your line of reasoning is upheld, CFJs have no meaning because they
do not refer to truth. If so, we have no conflict resolution system.
I'm concerned that purposely breaking the conflict resolution system
is not treating Agora Right Good Forever.

Reply via email to