Stop it, stop it! This sketch is too silly!
OscarMeyr
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
> I actually knew that already, so I'm not sure what I was thinking when I
> wrote that. Thanks for the correction, though.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On June 12, 2018 12:35 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > FYI: The Spivak pronoun nominative is "e", not "ey" (reflecting "he" and
> >
> > "she"), though you can, of course, use any pronouns you want.
> >
> > I favor the CFJ called by V.J. Rada in this thread.
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 12, 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:
> >
> > > I become a party to the contract "Sillyness by contract".
> > >
> > > I act on behalf of V.J. Rada to perform the following actions: {
> > >
> > > Destroy 1 apple to move V.J. Rada to (0, -1).
> > >
> > > Destroy 1 apple to move V.J. Rada to (-1, -1).
> > >
> > > Transfer all liquid assets from the mine at (-1, -1) to V.J. Rada.
> > >
> > > Transfer 3 stone and 2 ore from V.J. Rada to Trigon.
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > This meets the requirement of being extremely silly because it is only
> > >
> > > necessary due to a minor grammatical error on Trigon's part, and it
> meets
> > >
> > > the requirement of not harming V.J. Rada's standing in the game
> > >
> > > significantly because eir only loss from these actions is 2 apples
> (which
> > >
> > > ey already have plenty of) and the right to transfer assets from a
> > >
> > > preserved facility before next Friday (which ey already have enough
> assets
> > >
> > > not to have much need of).
> > >
> > > -twg
> > >
> > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > >
> > > On June 12, 2018 10:31 AM, Ned Strange edwardostra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > it doesn't, do it again
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Reuben Staley
> reuben.sta...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Could you guys let me do one thing in this game without pointing
> out
> > > > >
> > > > > how I
> > > >
> > > > > messed up?
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, okay. Here's a flimsy argument for why this works:
> > > > >
> > > > > I could only possibly transfer items to myself from a facility on a
> > > > >
> > > > > land
> > > >
> > > > > unit I'm on. Therefore, "that unit" should mean "the unit I'm on"
> since
> > > > >
> > > > > that's the only option for transferring. Therefore, the attempt
> > > > >
> > > > > succeeds.
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 04:13 Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On June 12, 2018 8:25 AM, Reuben Staley reuben.sta...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > I destroy a coin to make (-2, -1) black and switch the
> alternating
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > type.
> > > >
> > > > > > > I transfer the mine on that unit's resources to myself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this fails, because (-2,
> -1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > doesn't have a mine on it, and wasn't where you were standing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > anyway. I
> > > >
> > > > > > think you meant to reference the mine at (-1, -1), but I can't
> come
> > > > > >
> > > > > > up with
> > > >
> > > > > > a parsing where "that unit" refers to anything other than (-2,
> -1).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -twg
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > From V.J. Rada
> >
> > --
> >
> > ~Corona
>
>
>
