The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I present the following argument on the first docket to the court: > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated. > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested > nomics. > -- >From V.J. Rada
