The above rule is invalid: no quirky spelling

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <> wrote:

> I present the following argument on the first docket to the court:
> Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal
> error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In
> eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he
> proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that
> making such false statements before the court should be tolerated.
> Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections
> to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue
> that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe
> that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty
> battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most
> beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come
> together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding
> of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to
> address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding
> the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient
> Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the
> Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the
> Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested
> nomics.

>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to