No, e should be "referred to as such", but I was addressing em.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:44 PM Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This isn't related to this rule in particular, but isn't addressing you
> "Your Honor" illegal, given #6: "The Right Honourable
> Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such"?
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > appears VALID (again, formal response later).
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> > > I present the following argument on the first docket to the court:
> > >
> > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada seems to have made a fatal
> > > error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In
> > > eir argument, e stated that e would present six reasons. However, he
> > > proceeded to present five reasons. Your Honor, I do not believe that
> > > making such false statements before the court should be tolerated.
> > >
> > > Your Honor, while I concur with My Fellow Counselor Aris's objections
> > > to many of My Fellow Counselor V.J. Rada's reasons, I intend to argue
> > > that the arguments before the court are needless division. I believe
> > > that My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris are engaging in a petty
> > > battle to divide the Great and Ancient Nomics when it would be most
> > > beneficial to all, if the Great and Ancient Nomics were to come
> > > together in cooperation to attempt to develop a better understanding
> > > of the theory and practice of Nomic and develop a larger following to
> > > address the problems that My Fellow Counselor Aris noted, regarding
> > > the lack of dedication within the playerbase of the Great and Ancient
> > > Nomic of Agora. To this end, I propose that a Joint Commissions on the
> > > Shared Interests be formed to address those issues that affect the
> > > Great and Ancient Nomics, with representatives from all interested
> > > nomics.
> > >
> >
> >
