On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:53 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/6/2020 11:34 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via
> agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 11:19 AM ATMunn via agora-business
> > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> There's absolutely no way this will pass, but I'm going to try it
> >> anyways. Aris, I don't remember exactly when the midweek distribution
> >> deadline is, but don't worry about including this proposal in it.
> >>
> >>
> >> I submit the following proposal:
> >>
> >>
> >> Title: Bank Robbery
> >> AI: 1.0
> >> Author: ATMunn
> >> Co-author(s):
> >>
> >> Enact a rule entitled "Heists" with the following text:
> >> {
> >> At any time, any player CAN, by announcement, perform a Heist. Upon
> >> doing so, e CAN transfer up to half of the coins owned by Agora, rounded
> >> down, to emself. However, players MAY NOT perform a Heist. Doing so is
> >> the Class 3 Crime of Robbery.
> >> }
> >
> > Doesn't this give a huge advantage to the Assessor? I like the general
> > idea and would be interested in experimenting with it, but this gives
> > a significant advantage to the Assessor and actually uses Agora. If we
> > were going to do this, I would prefer that we establish some entity to
> > hold the money separately.
> >
>
> How does it give an advantage to the Assessor? What am I missing?E will have the first opportunity to do so and could do so as many times as necessary to cause Agora to have no coins in the same message in which e resolves the proposal.
