Hi Cara,

On 30 Jan 2007 at 5:04, Guitar Babe spoke, thus:

> Also, can you run down the software I'd need to compile the windows 
> binaries?  I haven't looked at them yet at all, so don't know what's
> there...

It's probably best to have Visual Studio, either version 6 or 7 (.NET), 
for Microsoft's optimising (not free - that's non-optimising and won't let 
you use static linking) Visual C++ compiler.  I think you can still get by 
with Visual Studio 6 (at least, I can, from an accessibility point of 
view, although it's a right nuisance), but version 7.0 or 7.1 (.NET 2003) 
are preferable for actual development and testing and improved code 
optimisation.  The executables that go into the packages definitely 
shouldn't absolutely require the latest compilers, though, so if it's just 
to have a shot at rebuilding the latest   sources then VC6 ought to be 
more than enough (but I really don't know what the results are since I 
don't maintain copies of the old project files for VS6 - if you have any 
luck, let us know).  Alternatively, using gcc is possible but (when I last 
checked) limited.  You should be able to use cygwin or the mingw toolset 
to cross-compile to native Win32 (though there  are some specific 
restrictions and the build system is updated rather infrequently).  Cross-
compiling from Linux should be possible too, but I don't know how good the 
results are.  Once again, I'm not aware of the state of play and if you do 
somehow manage to build a current executable with gcc for Windows using 
either Windows cygwin/mingw or Linux, let us know.  I haven't tried with 
any other compilers, but I imagine the adornment of MS-specific code will 
probably make it a bit hard to do (gcc on Linux and MSVC6 on Doze were the 
platforms iD used originally and probably still produce working results).  

Hope this is enough to get you going.

Cheers,
Sabahattin

-- 
Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Address harvesters, snag this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sound, QA, Misc. Development,
AGRIP Project
http://agrip.org.uk/

_______________________________________________
AGRIP-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agrip.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agrip-discuss

Reply via email to