From: "Rita Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Very valid point about the radiation dose with the extra erect abdo 
film.

Does that mean therefore that most places do only a supine film 
and AP chest
in the bed?


Rita

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fraser 
Levey
Sent: Friday, 31 January 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AIRNEWS] Risk Management

 From: "Fraser Levey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Interesting point from a radiation safety perspective too. Many UK 
hospitals
do not
routinely perform Erect Abdomens as they are seen as clinically 
irrelevant.
Most
pathology demonstrated is either clinically obvious or radiologically
ambiguous.

The elimination of such examinations would reduce a patients skin 
entrance
dose
by about 3.5 mGy, which is a fair old amount, which equates to 
about 35 PA
chest
exposures worth of radiation.

This, combined with the far greater risk of patients keeling over, 
would
make me
wish to  ensure that the referral is justified before exposing patients.

Fraser.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/03 09:33am >>>
From: "Garry Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

do you really need an erect abdo at all. we have one=20
radiologist that
insists we do not. Is it then possible to eliminate this exam=20
and thus
the risk (we haven't been able to eliminate due to referral=20
base and
other radiologists non acceptance)



+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+=3D+
=3D+=3D+=3D
+=3D+=3D
This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server

Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For assistance send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commands should be sent to airnews-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily those of the
moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.


**********************************************************************
This e-mail, including any attachments sent with it, is 
confidential=20
and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This 
confidentiality=20
is not waived or lost if you receive it and you are not the 
intended=20
recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/ received in error. =20

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or 
review=20
of this e-mail is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty 
of=20
confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received 
this=20
e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender 
by=20
telephone or by return e-mail.  You should also delete this e-
mail=20
message and destroy any hard copies produced.
**********************************************************************



 +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
 This message is being broadcast by AIRNEWS,
 the Australian Institute of Radiography list Server

 Send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For assistance send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Commands should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opinions expressed on this list are not necessarily those of the
moderator, his assistants or those of the A.I.R.

Reply via email to