I think that getting all the projects to conform would be an impossible
task. People just don't like having this sort of thing imposed on them -
even if it is 'the best' and, for want of a better term, 'standard'.
Good luck if you try to persue it though - it would make life easier! ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 09 August 2001 2:49 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gump] normalizing project descriptors
>
>
> Quick note...
>
> One solution to the problem of dependencies is to push this
> out of gump,
> and into the projects themselves.
>
> For example, if each project had in CVS in a well known location (such
> as the root of the project) a dependency descriptor, then it could be
> both used by gump to determine project dependencies, and jjar
> in a build
> to do the same.
>
> Also, it takes the burden off of gump to keep up, since a project will
> do that anyway...
>
> geir
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> System and Software Consulting
> Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
> Well done is better than well said - New England Proverb
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.
Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
