Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> >> The real question in my mind is - is the information provided by Gump
> >> useful?
> >
> >Yes, much so. But I personally think of Gump taking care of two concerns
> >at once, and, as today, it doesn't clearly separate them
>
> In calculus terms, the essence of Gump is to observe the system as dt
> approaches zero. One can deal with an amazing rate of change against an
> arbitrary large system if the time slice is small enough and the previous
> slice of the system is known to have worked.
Good description.
> > But I think we also need a nightly build system and Gump could easily
> > (as Sam tells me) provide both, so, why not doing both?
> >
> > Gump could build each project twice: the first time (as for nightly
> > build) with the tagged version of the CVS modules it requires, the
> > second time, with the head of the CVS.
> >
> > Both information is useful and both has value, IMO.
>
> Cool. I'll do the former. Still looking for a volunteer to do the latter.
Touche'. I might throw some cycles in but I can't guarantee anything.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
