Sam Ruby wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > >> So the moral of the story is: once log4j 1.2 ships, if you put it in > your > >> manifest, make sure to tell your users to stay away from Tomcat 4.x > (Tomcat > >> 3.x is just fine). > > > > We use LogKit exactly to avoid those static initializers :) > > Just to be clear...it is not log4j which uses static initializers, it is > Tyrex which calls log4j from a static initialiazer. In case you think that > depending on logkit makes you any more safe from breaking changes: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-11-01/xml-cocoon2.html > > What is very sad about this discussion is that whenever it comes up, I can > inevitably find timely (like this very morning) and relevant to the person > I'm talking to (Stefano/Cocoon) examples.
Sam: That was an experiment that I was trying to see GUMP information on, the next release will not have the build issues you have on the site. In fact, they are going to be fixed within the next half hour. > > - Sam Ruby > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "Those who would trade liberty for temporary security deserve neither" - Benjamin Franklin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
