Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > >
> > >> So the moral of the story is: once log4j 1.2 ships, if you put it in
> > your
> > >> manifest, make sure to tell your users to stay away from Tomcat 4.x
> > (Tomcat
> > >> 3.x is just fine).
> > >
> > > We use LogKit exactly to avoid those static initializers :)
> >
> > Just to be clear...it is not log4j which uses static initializers, it is
> > Tyrex which calls log4j from a static initialiazer. In case you think that
> > depending on logkit makes you any more safe from breaking changes:
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-11-01/xml-cocoon2.html
> >
> > What is very sad about this discussion is that whenever it comes up, I can
> > inevitably find timely (like this very morning) and relevant to the person
> > I'm talking to (Stefano/Cocoon) examples.
>
> Sam: That was an experiment that I was trying to see GUMP information on,
> the next release will not have the build issues you have on the site. In
> fact, they are going to be fixed within the next half hour.
It should now be properly deprecated--with Excalibur being updated RSN.
Cocoon will go back to normal.
--
"Those who would trade liberty for
temporary security deserve neither"
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
