I LOVE what I can learn on this list as long as we are allowed to wander a
bit. Thanks, Gary. 

 

I don't have any trouble believing that Narcissus 'Estettensis' is four
hundred year old, but seven hundred? 

 

For a clone which easily beats it in age, try Crocus sativus. Although
botanists to this day carry (it's the type species for the genus, so some
messiness would result if changes were to be made) it as a species, it is
unknown in the wild and does not match exactly any known sexually
reproducing population of wild crocus. It's traditionally assumed to be
derived some way from the crocus sometimes called Crocus cartwrightianus,
but I think Crocus moabiticus is also a good  candidate. Crocus sativus is
said to be triploid.  If Crocus sativus is truly clonal, it's at least two
and maybe three THOUSAND years old. Some grape cultivars seem to just as
old. 

 

Several years ago the topic of Queen Anne's daffodil came up in a discussion
on the Pacific Bulb Society list serve. Another participant told me he would
send me a bulb of Queen Anne's daffodil, but it did not arrive. Roger, are
you reading this? I'm getting pretty grumpy about it. 

 

Although a very rare plant now, four hundred years ago it was evidently
already being  grown in several European countries. 

 

Incidentally, Bowles spells the name eystettensis: have the modern daffodil
people changed it? 

 

Jim McKenney

_______________________________________________
Alpine-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/alpine-l

Reply via email to