>> they aren't. that's the whole problem. on my old system (148MB of >> RAM), allowing fsck to run would prevent memory allocation. i don't >> know of any distribution that inserts modules that early. do you? > >aha, but fsck runs even before snd-hammerfall-mem, doesn't it? (unless >you bulit it in kernel) otherwise it's dangerous...
no. absolutely not. i just added something equivalent to this to /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, right before fsck runs. insmod snd-hammerfall-mem since snd-hammerfall-mem has nothing to do with filesystems on disk, there is no danger. many other hammerfall users are doing equivalent things, and its also necessary under windows and macos. >now i understood the necessity of the allocation way of >snd-hammerfall-mem. we can merge the feature but it will be likely >after 0.9.0, as long as the old style works. i'd like to concentrate >on bug fixes now. as long as you propose to leave snd-hammerfall-mem in place. otherwise, you will make it impossible for many people to use their audio interfaces! --p ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
