as written in my previous mail, it was a quick hack. and there is a better approach.
I'd prefer the following approach:
pcmp.duplex {
type dmix
...
}pcmc.duplex {
type dsnoop
...
}with the following policy: - if capture is specified pcmc and pcm are searched in this order - if playback is specified pcmp and pcm are searched in this order
This would solve also the annoying problem of pcm that are valid only for one direction and should not be used (or browsed) for the other.
-- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opera Unica Phone: +39.0546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
