Woundy, Richard wrote:
I also am in favor of making both items into WG items.
Rich: OK, thanks.
Incidentally, is there a WG deadline for objecting?
Interesting question. I don't think there is a deadline
for objecting to an I-D. Technical dissent and solving
it through consensus is the life-blood of a WG, so objections
can be raised at any point in the process -- pre-WGLC, WGLC,
Gen-Art review, and finally, IESG review.
Even after a I-D becomes an RFC, errata can be filed against
the RFC. In the most egregious case, the flawed RFC can
be obsoleted with a new RFC.
I must preface in that the above is my understanding, subject
to corrections from the AD or other parties with more
information and experience on the process.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
