Woundy, Richard wrote:
I don't think there is a deadline for objecting to an I-D.
You are correct that objections may come at any time in the lifecycle of
an I-D (and errata can be posted against an RFC).
But it does help to set a "weak deadline" for objections to accepting
these documents as WG drafts, for a few reasons:
[...]
Ah, OK. I am with you now, Rich.
So, after consultation with my other esteemed co-chairs, let
me issue a clarification on my prior email:
OLD:
Please post on the list if there is any objection to moving the
above two drafts ahead.
NEW:
Please post on the list if there is any objection to moving the
above two drafts ahead. If there are no objections by **Wednesday,
April 15th, 2009,** draft-marocco-alto-problem-statement-05 and
draft-kiesel-alto-reqs-02 will be accepted as WG documents
fulfilling the "problem statement" and "requirements"
deliverables, respectively.
-- Rich, a former WG co-chair :)
- vijay, learning the ropes of being a WG co-chair ;-)
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: v...@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
