Hans,
Thanks, I will look that over. I certainly agree that the original network
& cost maps were not realistic, and I would be happy to switch to
something else.
While I do, here is a question for the rest of you. Who is using my public
ALTO server and test client? Assuming we do switch to different maps,
instead of maintaining two versions, I would prefer to do a flag-day
cutover. Would anyone have a problem with that? Assuming suitable
warning, of course.
- Wendy Roome
On 08/28/2015, 05:15, "Hans Seidel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>At the interop in Prague, Ingmar and I mentioned that cost values of the
>cost map in the current interop draft are not very realistic and we
>faced some problems feeding them into our server since we use real
>network data.
>I modified the current interop draft in such way that the cost map
>values are more realistic. To be as non-invasive as possible I left the
>network maps unmodified. Additionally, I added example network figures
>to the draft that
>can be used (and are used by us) to generate the default and alternate
>maps.
>
>We also updated our ALTO server accordingly:
>http://alto.benocs.berlin:8000/directory
>
>Find attached the modified version of the interop draft.
>Please have a look and send me some feedback.
>
>Cheers
>Hans
>
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
